BACKGROUND: Metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFR(+)) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can present de novo or following previous nonmetastatic disease (secondary). Potential differences between these two patient subsets are unclear at present. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed characteristics of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-treated patients with de novo vs. secondary metastatic EGFR(+) NSCLC until December 2019 (n = 401). RESULTS: De novo metastatic disease was 4× more frequent than secondary (n = 83/401), but no significant differences were noted regarding age (median 66 vs. 70 years), sex (65% vs. 65% females), smoking history (67% vs. 62% never/light-smokers), and histology (both >95% adenocarcinoma). Patients with secondary metastatic disease showed a better ECOG performance status (PS 0-1 67%-32% vs. 46%-52%, p = 0.003), fewer metastatic sites (mean 1.3 vs. 2.0, p < 0.001), and less frequent brain involvement (16% vs. 28%, p = 0.022) at the time of stage IV diagnosis. Progression-free survival (PFS) under TKI (median 17 for secondary vs. 12 months for de novo, p = 0.26) and overall survival (OS, 29 vs. 25 months, respectively, p = 0.47) were comparable. EGFR alterations (55% vs. 60% exon 19 deletions), TP53 mutation rate at baseline (47% vs. 43%, n = 262), and T790M positivity at the time of TKI failure (51% vs. 56%, n = 193) were also similar. OS according to differing characteristics, e.g., presence or absence of brain metastases (19-20 or 30-31 months, respectively, p = 0.001), and ECOG PS 0 or 1 or 2 (32-34 or 20-23 or 5-7 months, respectively, p < 0.001), were almost identical for de novo and secondary metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the survival advantage reported in the pre-TKI era for relapsed NSCLC, molecular features and outcome of TKI-treated metastatic EGFR(+) tumors are currently independent of preceding nonmetastatic disease. This simplifies design of outcome studies and can assist prognostic considerations in everyday management of patients with secondary metastatic EGFR(+) tumors.
- Bozorgmehr, F.
- Kazdal, D.
- Chung, I.
- Kirchner, M.
- Magios, N.
- Kriegsmann, M.
- Allgäuer, M.
- Klotz, L. V.
- Muley, T.
- El Shafie, R. A.
- Fischer, J. R.
- Faehling, M.
- Stenzinger, A.
- Thomas, M.
- Christopoulos, P.
Keywords
- Egfr+ nsclc
- comutations
- de novo
- metastatic disease
- prognosis
- secondary
- research grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, and Roche. DK reports personal fees from
- AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH, and personal fees from
- Pfizer Pharma GmbH. TM reports research funding from Roche and patents with Roche.
- JF reports advisory board honoraria from Boehringer, Roche, Celgene, and
- AstraZeneca. AS reports advisory board honoraria and/or speaker fees: Astra Zeneca,
- Bayer, Eli Lilly, Roche, BMS, Illumina, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics,
- Takeda, Thermo Fisher, and research grants from BMS, Bayer, and Chugai. MT reports
- advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Lilly, BMS, MSD, Roche, Celgene, Takeda,
- AbbVie, Boehringer, speaker’s honoraria from Lilly, MSD, Takeda, research funding
- from AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Novartis, Roche, and travel grants from BMS, MSD,
- Novartis, Boehringer. PC reports lecture/advisory board fees from AstraZeneca,
- Boehringer, Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda, as well as research funding
- from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda. The remaining authors declare that
- the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial
- relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.