BACKGROUND: The literature reports that hospital caseload volume is associated with survival for lung cancer resection. The aim of this study is to explore this association in a nationwide setting according to individual hospital caseload volume of every inpatient case in Germany. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of nationwide hospital discharge data in Germany between 2014 and 2017 comprises 121,837 patients of whom 36,051 (29.6 %) underwent surgical anatomic resection. Hospital volumes were defined according to the number of patient resections for lung cancer in each hospital, and patients were categorized into 5 quintiles based on hospital caseload volume. A logistic regression model accounting for death according to sex, age, comorbidity, and resection volume was calculated, and effect modification was evaluated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: In-house mortality ranged from 2.1 % in very high-volume centers to 4.0 % in very low-volume hospitals (p < 0.01). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, lower in-house mortality in very high-volume centers performing > 140 anatomic lung resections per year was observed compared with very low-volume centers performing < 27 resections (OR, 0.58; CI, 0.46 to 0.72; p < 0.01). This relationship also held for failure to rescue rates (12.9 vs 16.7 %, p = 0.01), although a greater number of extended resections were performed (23.1 vs. 14.8 %, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals with high volumes of lung cancer resections performed surgery with a higher ratio of complex procedures and achieved reduced in-house mortality, fewer complications, and lower failure to rescue rates.
- Baum, P.
- Diers, J.
- Haag, J.
- Klotz, L.
- Eichhorn, F.
- Eichhorn, M.
- Wiegering, A.
- Winter, H.
Keywords
- Caseload volume
- Complications
- Failure to rescue
- Germany
- Lung cancer
- Lymph node dissection
- Minimally invasive surgery
- Mortality
- Nsclc
- Procedure volume
- Surgery
- Thoracic surgery
- Volume outcome relationship