Science and Research

The immune microenvironment in EGFR- and ERBB2-mutated lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: Targeted therapies have improved survival and quality of life for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with actionable driver mutations. However, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (HER2, also known as ERBB2) exon 20 insertions (Ex20mut) are characterized by a poor response to currently approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapies. The underlying immune biology is not well understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out messenger RNA expression profiling of lung adenocarcinomas (ADCs) with ERBB2 (n = 19) and EGFR exon 20-insertion mutations (n = 13) and compared these to tumors with classical EGFR mutations (n = 40, affecting EGFR exons 18, 19 or 21) and EGFR/ERBB2 mutation-negative lung ADC (EGFR/ERBB2wt, n = 26) focusing on immunologically relevant transcripts. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells were estimated from gene expression profiles. RESULTS: Cytotoxic cells were significantly lower in EGFR-mutated tumors regardless of the affected exon, while Th1 cells were significantly lower in EGFR-Ex20mut compared to EGFR/ERBB2wt tumors. We assessed the differentially expressed genes of ERBB2-Ex20mut and EGFR-Ex20mut tumors compared to EGFR-Ex18/19/21mut and EGFR/ERBB2wt tumors. Of these, the genes GUSB, HDAC11, IFNGR2, PUM1, RASGRF1 and RBL2 were up-regulated, while a lower expression of CBLC, GBP1, GBP2, GBP4 and MYC was observed in all three comparison groups. The omnibus test revealed 185 significantly (FDR = 5%) differentially expressed genes and we found these four most significant gene expression changes in the study cohort: VHL and JAK1 were overexpressed in ERBB2-Ex20mut and EGFR-Ex20mut tumors compared to both EGFR-Ex18/19/21mut and EGFR/ERBB2wt tumors. RIPK1 and STK11IP showed the highest expression in ERBB2-Ex20mut tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted gene expression profiling is a promising tool to read out the characteristics of the tumor microenvironment from routine diagnostic lung cancer biopsies. Significant immune reactivity and specific immunosuppressive characteristics in ERBB2-Ex20mut and EGFR-Ex20mut lung ADC with at least some degree of immune infiltration support further clinical evaluation of immune-modulators as partners of immune checkpoint inhibitors in such tumors.

  • Kirchner, M.
  • Kluck, K.
  • Brandt, R.
  • Volckmar, A. L.
  • Penzel, R.
  • Kazdal, D.
  • Endris, V.
  • Neumann, O.
  • Seker-Cin, H.
  • Goldschmid, H.
  • Glade, J.
  • Allgauer, M.
  • Kriegsmann, M.
  • Winter, H.
  • Muley, T.
  • Perner, S.
  • Frost, N.
  • Reck, M.
  • Frohling, S.
  • Schirmacher, P.
  • Thomas, M.
  • Budczies, J.
  • Christopoulos, P.
  • Stenzinger, A.

Keywords

  • EGFR exon 20 insertion
  • ERBB2 exon 20 insertion
  • immunosuppression
  • lung adenocarcinoma
  • tumor microenvironment
  • personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH and Pfizer Pharma GmbH,
  • outside the submitted work. VE reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer,
  • Lilly, BMS, MSD Sharp, Novartis and Thermo Fisher, outside the submitted work. TM
  • reports grants and non-financial support from Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg,
  • Germany, outside the submitted work
  • in addition, TM has a patent WO2019158460
  • pending, a patent WO2019211418 pending, a patent WO2019215223 pending, a patent
  • EP3391053 issued and a patent EP3365679 pending. NF reports personal fees and
  • travel grants from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS and Takeda,
  • outside the submitted work, and personal fees from Amgen, BerlinChemie, BeiGene,
  • MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. MR reports
  • personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Merck,
  • MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Samsung, outside the submitted work. SF reports
  • personal fees from Amgen, Bayer, Eli Lilly and Roche
  • grants from AstraZeneca and
  • Pfizer
  • and grants and personal fees from PharmaMar, outside the submitted work.
  • PS reports grants from QuIP, during the conduct of the study
  • grants and personal
  • fees from BMS, MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis and Pfizer
  • personal fees from
  • Chugai, AbbVie and Ipsen
  • and grants from Sanofi-Aventis, Illumina and Thermo
  • Fisher, outside the submitted work. MT reports personal fees from AbbVie, Lilly
  • and Takeda
  • grants, personal fees and non-financial support from BMS
  • personal
  • fees and non-financial support from Boehringer, MSD and Novartis
  • grants and
  • personal fees from Celgene and Roche
  • and grants from AstraZeneca, outside the
  • submitted work. JB reports grants from German Cancer Aid, outside the submitted
  • work. PC reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche and
  • Takeda and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai and Pfizer, outside
  • the submitted work. AS reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Takeda,
  • Seattle Genetics, Novartis, Illumina, Thermo Fisher, Eli Lily and Takeda
  • grants
  • and personal fees from Bayer and BMS
  • and grants from Chugai, outside the
  • submitted work. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100253
Journal: ESMO Open
Pages: 100253 
Number: 5
Work Type: Original
Location: Assoziierter Partner, ARCN, TLRC
Disease Area: LC
Partner / Member: BIH, DKFZ, FZB, Ghd, Thorax, UKHD, UKSH (Lübeck)
Access-Number: 34487971
See publication on PubMed

DZL Engagements

chevron-down